Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Hammonton, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Hammonton, NJ.
| Data | Clinton | Hammonton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 14,833 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 46.2 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $79,747 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Hammonton
- The population in Hammonton is higher at 14,833, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Hammonton is higher at 46.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Hammonton has a higher median income of $79,747, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Hammonton, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Hammonton.
- Hammonton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Hammonton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Hammonton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 2 |
| White | 55 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Hammonton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 2% in Hammonton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hammonton at 67% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 1% in Hammonton.
- Hammonton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hammonton at 5%, compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Hammonton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Hammonton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Hammonton
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.0% in Hammonton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 21.9% in Hammonton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 15.5% in Hammonton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hammonton at 19.9% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 34.1% in Hammonton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Hammonton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Hammonton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 1.3% (189) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 24.8% (3,684) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 14.7% (2,184) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 21.6% (3,206) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Hammonton
- In Hammonton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- In Hammonton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- More residents in Clinton have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 14.7% in Hammonton.
- In Hammonton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.