Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Fairview heights, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Fairview heights, IL.
| Data | Clinton | Fairview heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 16,324 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $74,038 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Fairview heights
- The population in Fairview heights is higher at 16,324, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Fairview heights is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Fairview heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clinton and Fairview heights at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Fairview heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 30 |
| White | 55 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Fairview heights
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 30% in Fairview heights.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 54% in Fairview heights.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 1% in Fairview heights.
- Fairview heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Fairview heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Fairview heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 42.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Fairview heights
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 19.0% in Fairview heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 42.1% in Fairview heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Fairview heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 1.0% (168) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 14.5% (2,359) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 7.3% (1,187) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 22.0% (3,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Fairview heights
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clinton and Fairview heights at 1.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents in Clinton have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
- In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 17.3% in Clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.