Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Corsicana, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Corsicana, TX.
| Data | Clinton | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 25,566 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $49,353 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Corsicana
- The population in Corsicana is higher at 25,566, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Clinton have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 34.6 years in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher median income of $49,353, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Corsicana, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- Clinton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Corsicana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 17 |
| White | 55 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Corsicana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 17% in Corsicana.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 1% in Corsicana.
- Corsicana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corsicana at 10%, compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clinton and Corsicana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Corsicana
- More residents in Clinton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.7% in Corsicana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clinton at 23.7% compared to 23.5% in Corsicana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clinton at 22.0% compared to 19.9% in Corsicana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corsicana at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 40.1% in Corsicana.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clinton and Corsicana at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Corsicana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 3.7% (957) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 14.2% (3,633) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 25.3% (6,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 9.2% (2,357) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Corsicana
- In Corsicana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.0% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corsicana at 25.3%, compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.