Demographics details for Clinton, SC vs Clearlake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clinton, SC vs Clearlake, CA.
| Data | Clinton | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,554 | 16,693 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $38,350 | $41,047 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 7.2 |
Population Comparison: Clinton vs Clearlake
- The population in Clearlake is higher at 16,693, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- The median age in Clearlake is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Clearlake has a higher median income of $41,047, compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- In Clearlake, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearlake at 21%, compared to 18% in Clinton.
- Clearlake has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 4.5% in Clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Clinton vs Clearlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clinton | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 4 |
| White | 55 | 48 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Clinton vs Clearlake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clinton at 38% compared to 4% in Clearlake.
- Clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Clinton at 2% compared to 1% in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 1% in Clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clearlake at 13%, compared to 4% in Clinton.
- In Clearlake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clinton | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 21.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.0% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clinton vs Clearlake
- In Clearlake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 19.1% in Clinton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clearlake at 24.7% versus 23.7% in Clinton.
- Clearlake has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 22.0% in Clinton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clinton at 15.8% compared to 15.2% in Clearlake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clinton at 44.9% compared to 37.7% in Clearlake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clinton | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (74) | 0.6% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 19.3% (1,460) | 19.1% (3,190) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (1,177) | 25.8% (4,311) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (1,310) | 5.3% (883) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clinton vs Clearlake
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Clearlake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Clearlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearlake at 25.8%, compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 5.3% in Clearlake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.