Demographics details for Clifton, NJ vs Helper, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton, NJ vs Helper, UT.
| Data | Clifton | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 88,709 | 2,131 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $94,179 | $59,323 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clifton vs Helper
- In Clifton, the population is higher at 88,709, compared to 2,131 in Helper.
- The median age in Helper is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 40.2 years in Clifton.
- Clifton has a higher median income of $94,179 compared to $59,323 in Helper.
- In Helper, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 40.0% in Clifton.
- The poverty level is higher in Helper at 11%, compared to 7% in Clifton.
- The unemployment rate in Clifton is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton vs Helper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 34 | 85 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 39 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton vs Helper
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clifton at 5% compared to 0% in Helper.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Helper at 85% compared to 34% in Clifton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clifton at 9% compared to 0% in Helper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clifton at 39% compared to 10% in Helper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clifton at 13% compared to 5% in Helper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton and Helper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton vs Helper
- In Helper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Clifton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Helper at 25.3% versus 16.7% in Clifton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton at 12.0% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clifton at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Helper has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 28.2% in Clifton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Helper at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Clifton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton | Helper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (1,937) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (18,683) | 23.4% (499) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (13,251) | 8.7% (185) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.9% (22,116) | 18.7% (399) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton vs Helper
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- In Helper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 21.1% in Clifton.
- More residents in Clifton have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.9% compared to 18.7% in Helper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.