Demographics details for Clifton, KS vs Granite bay, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton, KS vs Granite bay, CA.
| Data | Clifton | Granite bay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 447 | 22,180 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 47.7 years |
| Median Income | $51,563 | $177,803 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clifton vs Granite bay
- The population in Granite bay is higher at 22,180, compared to 447 in Clifton.
- The median age in Granite bay is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 43.5 years in Clifton.
- Granite bay has a higher median income of $177,803, compared to $51,563 in Clifton.
- In Granite bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 41.0% in Clifton.
- The poverty level is higher in Granite bay at 2%, compared to 0% in Clifton.
- Granite bay has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Clifton.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton vs Granite bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton | Granite bay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 93 | 74 |
| Asian | 4 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton vs Granite bay
- In Granite bay, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Clifton.
- Clifton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 74% in Granite bay.
- In Granite bay, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 4% in Clifton.
- Granite bay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Clifton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Granite bay at 5%, compared to 1% in Clifton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton and Granite bay at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton | Granite bay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 24.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton vs Granite bay
- More residents in Clifton report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.1% in Granite bay.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clifton at 20.7% compared to 18.9% in Granite bay.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton at 18.8% compared to 8.6% in Granite bay.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clifton at 20.8% compared to 19.3% in Granite bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton at 40.0% compared to 24.6% in Granite bay.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clifton at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Granite bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton | Granite bay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.2% (45) |
| High School Diploma | 29.1% (130) | 6.4% (1,425) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (32) | 3.4% (753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (65) | 41.4% (9,173) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton vs Granite bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Granite bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hold a high school diploma at 29.1% compared to 6.4% in Granite bay.
- More residents in Clifton have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 3.4% in Granite bay.
- In Granite bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.4% compared to 14.5% in Clifton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.