Demographics details for Clifton, KS vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton, KS vs Cross city, FL.
Data | Clifton | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Population | 447 | 1,754 |
Median Age | 43.5 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $51,563 | $44,500 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clifton vs Cross city
- The population in Cross city is higher at 1,754, compared to 447 in Clifton.
- Residents in Clifton have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
- Clifton has a higher median income of $51,563 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 41.0% in Clifton.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 0% in Clifton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clifton and Cross city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clifton | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 20 |
White | 93 | 61 |
Asian | 4 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Clifton.
- Clifton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- The Asian population is larger in Clifton at 4% compared to 2% in Cross city.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Clifton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cross city at 8%, compared to 1% in Clifton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton and Cross city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clifton | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 15.8% |
Depression | 20.7% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 29.1% |
Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.7% in Clifton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 20.7% in Clifton.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 18.8% in Clifton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clifton at 20.8% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 40.0% in Clifton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 19.0% in Clifton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clifton | Cross city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.9% (15) |
High School Diploma | 29.1% (130) | 39.2% (688) |
Less than High School | 7.2% (32) | 11.7% (205) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (65) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Clifton.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 29.1% in Clifton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cross city at 11.7%, compared to 7.2% in Clifton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.