Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Sweetwater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Sweetwater, TX.
Data | Clifton hill | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 87 | 10,408 |
Median Age | 28.3 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $45,500 | $44,306 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Sweetwater
- The population in Sweetwater is higher at 10,408, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- The median age in Sweetwater is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher median income of $45,500 compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton hill vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clifton hill | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 94 | 34 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 46 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
- Both Clifton hill and Sweetwater have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sweetwater at 13%, compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clifton hill | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 14.3% |
Depression | 25.9% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 24.2% in Sweetwater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 20.3% in Sweetwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 38.9% in Sweetwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clifton hill | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.9% (194) |
High School Diploma | 26.4% (23) | 16.0% (1,666) |
Less than High School | 13.8% (12) | 23.1% (2,408) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (3) | 7.0% (733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 16.0% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 13.8% in Clifton hill.
- In Sweetwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.0% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.