Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Providence, RI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Providence, RI.

Data Clifton hill Providence
Population 87 189,563
Median Age 28.3 years 32.3 years
Median Income $45,500 $61,365
Married Families 31.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 10% 24%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.7

Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Providence

  • The population in Providence is higher at 189,563, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
  • The median age in Providence is higher at 32.3 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Providence has a higher median income of $61,365, compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton hill at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Providence.
  • The poverty level is higher in Providence at 24%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
  • Providence has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.

Demographics

Demographics Clifton hill vs Providence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clifton hill Providence
Black Data is updating 15
White 94 21
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic Data is updating 43
Two or More Races 6 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Providence

  • In Providence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 21% in Providence.
  • In Providence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Clifton hill.
  • Providence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Providence at 14%, compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
  • In Providence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clifton hill Providence
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 12.9%
Depression 25.9% 24.7%
Smoking 21.4% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 15.4%
Obesity 41.6% 35.5%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Providence

  • More residents in Clifton hill report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Providence.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 24.7% in Providence.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 16.7% in Providence.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 15.4% in Providence.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 35.5% in Providence.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Providence at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clifton hill Providence
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.9% (3,604)
High School Diploma 26.4% (23) 15.7% (29,732)
Less than High School 13.8% (12) 19.5% (36,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.4% (3) 21.6% (40,951)

Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Providence

  • In Providence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 15.7% in Providence.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Providence at 19.5%, compared to 13.8% in Clifton hill.
  • In Providence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.6% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.