Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Moscow, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Moscow, ID.
| Data | Clifton hill | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87 | 26,249 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,500 | $53,679 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Moscow
- The population in Moscow is higher at 26,249, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- Residents in Clifton hill have a higher median age of 28.3 years compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher median income of $53,679, compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton hill at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- The poverty level is higher in Moscow at 15%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- Moscow has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton hill vs Moscow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton hill | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 94 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Moscow
- In Moscow, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 83% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Clifton hill.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Both Clifton hill and Moscow have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- In Moscow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton hill | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Moscow
- More residents in Clifton hill report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 24.5% in Moscow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moscow at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moscow at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton hill | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (80) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (23) | 5.7% (1,492) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (12) | 2.0% (515) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (3) | 25.8% (6,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Moscow
- In Moscow, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- More residents in Clifton hill have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- In Moscow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.