Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Hooks, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Hooks, TX.
| Data | Clifton hill | Hooks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87 | 2,494 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,500 | $52,031 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Hooks
- The population in Hooks is higher at 2,494, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- The median age in Hooks is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Hooks has a higher median income of $52,031, compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- In Hooks, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clifton hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Hooks at 13%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clifton hill and Hooks at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton hill vs Hooks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton hill | Hooks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 94 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Hooks
- In Hooks, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 79% in Hooks.
- Both Clifton hill and Hooks have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hooks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clifton hill at 6% compared to 4% in Hooks.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Hooks at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton hill | Hooks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 21.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Hooks
- In Hooks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 25.7% in Hooks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 21.1% in Hooks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hooks at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Clifton hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 39.2% in Hooks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hooks at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton hill | Hooks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (23) | 23.1% (576) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (12) | 11.4% (285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (3) | 14.2% (354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Hooks
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clifton hill and Hooks at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 23.1% in Hooks.
- More residents in Clifton hill have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 11.4% in Hooks.
- In Hooks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.