Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Butler, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Butler, GA.
Data | Clifton hill | Butler |
---|---|---|
Population | 87 | 1,827 |
Median Age | 28.3 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $45,500 | $27,656 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Butler
- The population in Butler is higher at 1,827, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- The median age in Butler is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher median income of $45,500 compared to $27,656 in Butler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton hill at 31.0% compared to 24.0% in Butler.
- The poverty level is higher in Butler at 20%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- Butler has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton hill vs Butler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clifton hill | Butler |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 70 |
White | 94 | 22 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Butler
- In Butler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 22% in Butler.
- In Butler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clifton hill.
- Butler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clifton hill at 6% compared to 4% in Butler.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Butler at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clifton hill | Butler |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 21.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.9% |
Depression | 25.9% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 12.7% |
Obesity | 41.6% | 46.9% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Butler
- In Butler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 23.4% in Butler.
- Butler has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 21.4% in Clifton hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 12.7% in Butler.
- Butler has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 41.6% in Clifton hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Butler at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clifton hill | Butler |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 26.4% (23) | 28.5% (520) |
Less than High School | 13.8% (12) | 23.9% (436) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (3) | 8.0% (147) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Butler
- In Butler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- In Butler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.5% compared to 26.4% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Butler at 23.9%, compared to 13.8% in Clifton hill.
- In Butler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.0% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.