Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Arnett, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Arnett, WV.

Data Clifton hill Arnett
Population 87 59
Median Age 28.3 years 42.0 years
Median Income $45,500 $35,000
Married Families 31.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 10% 35%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Arnett

  • In Clifton hill, the population is higher at 87, compared to 59 in Arnett.
  • The median age in Arnett is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
  • Clifton hill has a higher median income of $45,500 compared to $35,000 in Arnett.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton hill at 31.0% compared to 24.0% in Arnett.
  • The poverty level is higher in Arnett at 35%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
  • Arnett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.

Demographics

Demographics Clifton hill vs Arnett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clifton hill Arnett
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 94 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Arnett

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Arnett at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Arnett at 100% compared to 94% in Clifton hill.
  • Both Clifton hill and Arnett have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Arnett at 0%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clifton hill at 6% compared to 0% in Arnett.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clifton hill and Arnett at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clifton hill Arnett
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% Data is updating%
Depression 25.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 21.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 41.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 6.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Arnett

  • More residents in Clifton hill report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clifton hill at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clifton hill Arnett
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 26.4% (23) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.8% (12) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 3.4% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Arnett

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clifton hill and Arnett at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • More residents in Clifton hill have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.