Demographics details for Clifton hill, MO vs Ada, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clifton hill, MO vs Ada, OK.
| Data | Clifton hill | Ada |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87 | 16,542 |
| Median Age | 28.3 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,500 | $47,264 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Clifton hill vs Ada
- The population in Ada is higher at 16,542, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- The median age in Ada is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Ada has a higher median income of $47,264, compared to $45,500 in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clifton hill at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Ada.
- The poverty level is higher in Ada at 14%, compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- The unemployment rate in Clifton hill is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.7% in Ada.
Demographics
Demographics Clifton hill vs Ada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clifton hill | Ada |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 94 | 55 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 18 |
Demographics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Ada
- In Ada, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 55% in Ada.
- In Ada, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clifton hill.
- Ada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ada at 14%, compared to 6% in Clifton hill.
- In Ada, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 18%, compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clifton hill | Ada |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 41.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clifton hill vs Ada
- In Ada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ada at 26.3% versus 25.9% in Clifton hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clifton hill at 21.4% compared to 21.3% in Ada.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 13.8% in Ada.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clifton hill at 41.6% compared to 37.3% in Ada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ada at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clifton hill | Ada |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 26.4% (23) | 15.2% (2,519) |
| Less than High School | 13.8% (12) | 12.5% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.4% (3) | 17.8% (2,952) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clifton hill vs Ada
- In Ada, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clifton hill hold a high school diploma at 26.4% compared to 15.2% in Ada.
- More residents in Clifton hill have less than a high school education at 13.8% compared to 12.5% in Ada.
- In Ada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.