Demographics details for Cleveland, MS vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleveland, MS vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Cleveland | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,545 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $42,005 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Cleveland vs Mccurtain
- The population in Mccurtain is higher at 30,931, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
- The median age in Mccurtain is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- Mccurtain has a higher median income of $47,046, compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 12% in Mccurtain.
- The unemployment rate in Cleveland is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.6% in Mccurtain.
Demographics
Demographics Cleveland vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleveland | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 8 |
| White | 36 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Cleveland vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleveland at 56% compared to 8% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleveland at 2% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Cleveland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleveland | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleveland vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.6% in Cleveland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 20.4% in Cleveland.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 21.0% in Cleveland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mccurtain at 13.7% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 41.4% in Cleveland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Cleveland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleveland | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (99) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (1,059) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (1,404) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (2,242) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleveland vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 13.3% in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.