Demographics details for Cleveland, MS vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleveland, MS vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Cleveland | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,545 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $42,005 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cleveland vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Cleveland is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Cleveland vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleveland | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 56 | 7 |
| White | 36 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleveland vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleveland at 56% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Cleveland.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cleveland and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleveland | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleveland vs Loves park
- More residents in Cleveland report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Loves park at 21.3% versus 20.4% in Cleveland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleveland at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleveland at 41.4% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleveland | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (99) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 10.0% (1,059) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (1,404) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (2,242) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleveland vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- More residents in Cleveland have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.