Demographics details for Cleveland, GA vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleveland, GA vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Cleveland | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,548 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,994 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Cleveland vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 3,548 in Cleveland.
- Residents in Cleveland have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher median income of $53,783, compared to $46,994 in Cleveland.
- In Fairborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Cleveland.
Demographics
Demographics Cleveland vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleveland | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 9 |
| White | 84 | 78 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleveland vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 78% in Fairborn.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleveland at 2% compared to 1% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairborn at 8%, compared to 7% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cleveland and Fairborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleveland | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleveland vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Cleveland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cleveland at 24.2% compared to 23.4% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 18.9% in Cleveland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Cleveland.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 33.2% in Cleveland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cleveland at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Fairborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleveland | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (30) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 18.5% (656) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 15.4% (545) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (362) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleveland vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland hold a high school diploma at 18.5% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Cleveland have less than a high school education at 15.4% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.2% in Cleveland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.