Demographics details for Cleveland heights, OH vs Meade, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cleveland heights, OH vs Meade, KS.

Data Cleveland heights Meade
Population 44,201 3,897
Median Age 36.7 years 37.7 years
Median Income $69,155 $74,063
Married Families 33.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 2.9

Population Comparison: Cleveland heights vs Meade

  • In Cleveland heights, the population is higher at 44,201, compared to 3,897 in Meade.
  • The median age in Meade is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 36.7 years in Cleveland heights.
  • Meade has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $69,155 in Cleveland heights.
  • In Meade, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 33.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • Cleveland heights has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Meade.
  • The unemployment rate in Cleveland heights is higher at 4.6%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.

Demographics

Demographics Cleveland heights vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cleveland heights Meade
Black 42 1
White 46 69
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 3 23
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cleveland heights vs Meade

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleveland heights at 42% compared to 1% in Meade.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Meade at 69% compared to 46% in Cleveland heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cleveland heights at 5% compared to 1% in Meade.
  • Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Cleveland heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meade at 6%, compared to 4% in Cleveland heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cleveland heights and Meade at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cleveland heights Meade
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 10.8%
Depression 21.8% 20.0%
Smoking 16.0% 18.2%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 18.8%
Obesity 34.5% 40.1%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cleveland heights vs Meade

  • In Meade, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cleveland heights at 21.8% compared to 20.0% in Meade.
  • Meade has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Cleveland heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Meade at 18.8% compared to 16.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 34.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cleveland heights at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cleveland heights Meade
No Schooling 0.4% (157) 0.2% (9)
High School Diploma 9.5% (4,183) 13.7% (532)
Less than High School 3.7% (1,638) 18.0% (701)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.6% (17,513) 15.9% (619)

Education Levels Comparison: Cleveland heights vs Meade

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland heights have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
  • In Meade, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 9.5% in Cleveland heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meade at 18.0%, compared to 3.7% in Cleveland heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cleveland heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 15.9% in Meade.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.