Demographics details for Clermont, IA vs Mcdonough, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clermont, IA vs Mcdonough, GA.
| Data | Clermont | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 577 | 30,340 |
| Median Age | 50.3 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $70,104 | $77,804 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Clermont vs Mcdonough
- The population in Mcdonough is higher at 30,340, compared to 577 in Clermont.
- Residents in Clermont have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804, compared to $70,104 in Clermont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clermont at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcdonough at 13%, compared to 5% in Clermont.
- Mcdonough has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.2% in Clermont.
Demographics
Demographics Clermont vs Mcdonough provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clermont | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 70 |
| White | 98 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clermont vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Clermont.
- Clermont has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clermont.
- Mcdonough has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Clermont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcdonough at 8%, compared to 2% in Clermont.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clermont and Mcdonough at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clermont | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clermont vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.4% in Clermont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcdonough at 19.6% versus 18.8% in Clermont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clermont at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clermont at 21.6% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 39.0% in Clermont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clermont at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clermont | Mcdonough |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (221) |
| High School Diploma | 20.6% (119) | 14.8% (4,501) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (36) | 4.9% (1,500) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (56) | 16.1% (4,882) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clermont vs Mcdonough
- In Mcdonough, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Clermont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clermont hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 14.8% in Mcdonough.
- More residents in Clermont have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Mcdonough, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 9.7% in Clermont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.