Demographics details for Clermont, IA vs Coconut creek, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clermont, IA vs Coconut creek, FL.

Data Clermont Coconut creek
Population 577 57,348
Median Age 50.3 years 42.4 years
Median Income $70,104 $72,740
Married Families 41.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Clermont vs Coconut creek

  • The population in Coconut creek is higher at 57,348, compared to 577 in Clermont.
  • Residents in Clermont have a higher median age of 50.3 years compared to 42.4 years in Coconut creek.
  • Coconut creek has a higher median income of $72,740, compared to $70,104 in Clermont.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clermont at 41.0% compared to 37.0% in Coconut creek.
  • The poverty level is higher in Coconut creek at 10%, compared to 5% in Clermont.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Clermont and Coconut creek at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Clermont vs Coconut creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clermont Coconut creek
Black Data is updating 15
White 98 39
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 27
Two or More Races 2 16
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clermont vs Coconut creek

  • In Coconut creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Clermont.
  • Clermont has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 39% in Coconut creek.
  • In Coconut creek, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Clermont.
  • Coconut creek has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Clermont.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coconut creek at 16%, compared to 2% in Clermont.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clermont and Coconut creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clermont Coconut creek
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 9.9%
Depression 18.8% 17.8%
Smoking 16.7% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 21.6% 15.6%
Obesity 39.0% 27.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clermont vs Coconut creek

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Clermont and Coconut creek at 15.4%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clermont at 18.8% compared to 17.8% in Coconut creek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clermont at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Coconut creek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clermont at 21.6% compared to 15.6% in Coconut creek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clermont at 39.0% compared to 27.5% in Coconut creek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coconut creek at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Clermont.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clermont Coconut creek
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.4% (831)
High School Diploma 20.6% (119) 16.6% (9,506)
Less than High School 6.2% (36) 8.9% (5,111)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (56) 26.5% (15,196)

Education Levels Comparison: Clermont vs Coconut creek

  • In Coconut creek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Clermont.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clermont hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 16.6% in Coconut creek.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coconut creek at 8.9%, compared to 6.2% in Clermont.
  • In Coconut creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 9.7% in Clermont.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.