Demographics details for Clermont, FL vs Manchester, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clermont, FL vs Manchester, NH.
Data | Clermont | Manchester |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,506 | 115,141 |
Median Age | 41.7 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $75,951 | $74,040 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Clermont vs Manchester
- The population in Manchester is higher at 115,141, compared to 46,506 in Clermont.
- Residents in Clermont have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 37.0 years in Manchester.
- Clermont has a higher median income of $75,951 compared to $74,040 in Manchester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clermont at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Manchester.
- The poverty level is higher in Manchester at 10%, compared to 9% in Clermont.
- The unemployment rate in Clermont is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.6% in Manchester.
Demographics
Demographics Clermont vs Manchester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clermont | Manchester |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 6 |
White | 45 | 68 |
Asian | 4 | 5 |
Hispanic | 21 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clermont vs Manchester
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clermont at 14% compared to 6% in Manchester.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manchester at 68% compared to 45% in Clermont.
- In Manchester, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Clermont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clermont at 21% compared to 12% in Manchester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clermont at 16% compared to 9% in Manchester.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clermont and Manchester at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clermont | Manchester |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.5% |
Depression | 19.5% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 17.2% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clermont vs Manchester
- In Manchester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.7% in Clermont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Manchester at 24.5% versus 19.5% in Clermont.
- Manchester has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in Clermont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clermont at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Manchester.
- Manchester has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 34.9% in Clermont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manchester at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Clermont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clermont | Manchester |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (195) | 1.1% (1,316) |
High School Diploma | 12.5% (5,809) | 17.0% (19,519) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (2,631) | 15.1% (17,348) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (10,177) | 23.1% (26,548) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clermont vs Manchester
- In Manchester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Clermont.
- In Manchester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 12.5% in Clermont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manchester at 15.1%, compared to 5.7% in Clermont.
- In Manchester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 21.9% in Clermont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.