Demographics details for Clermont, FL vs Lumber bridge, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clermont, FL vs Lumber bridge, NC.

Data Clermont Lumber bridge
Population 46,506 82
Median Age 41.7 years 43.8 years
Median Income $75,951 $61,250
Married Families 41.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.6

Population Comparison: Clermont vs Lumber bridge

  • In Clermont, the population is higher at 46,506, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
  • The median age in Lumber bridge is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 41.7 years in Clermont.
  • Clermont has a higher median income of $75,951 compared to $61,250 in Lumber bridge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clermont at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lumber bridge at 12%, compared to 9% in Clermont.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.7% in Clermont.

Demographics

Demographics Clermont vs Lumber bridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clermont Lumber bridge
Black 14 7
White 45 88
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 Data is updating
Two or More Races 16 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating 5

Demographics Comparison: Clermont vs Lumber bridge

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clermont at 14% compared to 7% in Lumber bridge.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lumber bridge at 88% compared to 45% in Clermont.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clermont at 4% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clermont at 21% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clermont at 16% compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • In Lumber bridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Clermont.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clermont Lumber bridge
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 14.2%
Depression 19.5% 23.8%
Smoking 17.2% 23.0%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 16.2%
Obesity 34.9% 40.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clermont vs Lumber bridge

  • In Lumber bridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.7% in Clermont.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lumber bridge at 23.8% versus 19.5% in Clermont.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 17.2% in Clermont.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lumber bridge at 16.2% compared to 15.5% in Clermont.
  • Lumber bridge has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 34.9% in Clermont.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clermont at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clermont Lumber bridge
No Schooling 0.4% (195) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 12.5% (5,809) 32.9% (27)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,631) 9.8% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.9% (10,177) 7.3% (6)

Education Levels Comparison: Clermont vs Lumber bridge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clermont have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • In Lumber bridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 12.5% in Clermont.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lumber bridge at 9.8%, compared to 5.7% in Clermont.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clermont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.