Demographics details for Clermont, FL vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clermont, FL vs Fort payne, AL.
| Data | Clermont | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,506 | 14,879 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $75,951 | $44,549 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Clermont vs Fort payne
- In Clermont, the population is higher at 46,506, compared to 14,879 in Fort payne.
- Residents in Clermont have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 39.7 years in Fort payne.
- Clermont has a higher median income of $75,951 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clermont at 41.0% compared to 38.0% in Fort payne.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort payne at 11%, compared to 9% in Clermont.
- The unemployment rate in Clermont is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Clermont vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clermont | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 2 |
| White | 45 | 72 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Clermont vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clermont at 14% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort payne at 72% compared to 45% in Clermont.
- The Asian population is larger in Clermont at 4% compared to 0% in Fort payne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clermont at 21% compared to 20% in Fort payne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clermont at 16% compared to 4% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Clermont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clermont | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clermont vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 15.7% in Clermont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 19.5% in Clermont.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 17.2% in Clermont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clermont at 15.5% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 34.9% in Clermont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Clermont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clermont | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (195) | 2.7% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 12.5% (5,809) | 14.2% (2,110) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (2,631) | 27.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (10,177) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clermont vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Clermont.
- In Fort payne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 12.5% in Clermont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort payne at 27.9%, compared to 5.7% in Clermont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clermont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 11.9% in Fort payne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.