Demographics details for Clemmons, NC vs Shelbina, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clemmons, NC vs Shelbina, MO.
| Data | Clemmons | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,823 | 1,582 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $75,667 | $52,050 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clemmons vs Shelbina
- In Clemmons, the population is higher at 21,823, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- Residents in Clemmons have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.6 years in Shelbina.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667 compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 45.0% in Clemmons.
- The poverty level is higher in Shelbina at 11%, compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clemmons and Shelbina at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clemmons vs Shelbina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clemmons | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 76 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Clemmons vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clemmons at 6% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbina at 89% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- The Asian population is larger in Clemmons at 5% compared to 0% in Shelbina.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clemmons at 6% compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clemmons at 6% compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Clemmons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clemmons | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 23.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clemmons vs Shelbina
- In Shelbina, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbina at 26.4% versus 23.7% in Clemmons.
- Shelbina has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clemmons at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- Shelbina has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clemmons | Shelbina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (140) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (2,040) | 31.1% (492) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (1,429) | 17.6% (279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.0% (7,418) | 14.2% (225) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clemmons vs Shelbina
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- In Shelbina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.1% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbina at 17.6%, compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 14.2% in Shelbina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.