Demographics details for Clemmons, NC vs Pittsford, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clemmons, NC vs Pittsford, VT.
Data | Clemmons | Pittsford |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,823 | 2,807 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $75,667 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 1.7 |
Population Comparison: Clemmons vs Pittsford
- In Clemmons, the population is higher at 21,823, compared to 2,807 in Pittsford.
- Residents in Clemmons have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 42.0 years in Pittsford.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667 compared to $65,000 in Pittsford.
- In Pittsford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 45.0% in Clemmons.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clemmons and Pittsford at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Clemmons is higher at 3.5%, compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.
Demographics
Demographics Clemmons vs Pittsford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clemmons | Pittsford |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 97 |
Asian | 5 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clemmons vs Pittsford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clemmons at 6% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsford at 97% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- The Asian population is larger in Clemmons at 5% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clemmons at 6% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clemmons at 6% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clemmons at 1% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clemmons | Pittsford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.7% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 12.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 29.7% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clemmons vs Pittsford
- More residents in Clemmons report poor mental health at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clemmons at 23.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clemmons at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clemmons at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clemmons at 29.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clemmons at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clemmons | Pittsford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (140) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.3% (2,040) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.5% (1,429) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.0% (7,418) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clemmons vs Pittsford
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons hold a high school diploma at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- More residents in Clemmons have less than a high school education at 6.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.