Demographics details for Clemmons, NC vs Lancaster, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clemmons, NC vs Lancaster, SC.
| Data | Clemmons | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,823 | 104,577 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $75,667 | $72,186 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Clemmons vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 104,577, compared to 21,823 in Clemmons.
- Residents in Clemmons have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 42.2 years in Lancaster.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667 compared to $72,186 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clemmons at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Clemmons.
Demographics
Demographics Clemmons vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clemmons | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 18 |
| White | 76 | 70 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clemmons vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- Clemmons has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 70% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Clemmons at 5% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clemmons and Lancaster at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clemmons at 6% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clemmons at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clemmons | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 29.7% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clemmons vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clemmons at 23.7% compared to 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clemmons at 17.8% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clemmons | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (140) | 0.7% (689) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (2,040) | 16.0% (16,691) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (1,429) | 12.5% (13,112) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.0% (7,418) | 20.2% (21,156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clemmons vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Clemmons.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 12.5%, compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clemmons hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 20.2% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.