Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Waterloo, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Waterloo, AL.
| Data | Cleburne | Waterloo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 183 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 59.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $38,750 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Waterloo
- In Cleburne, the population is higher at 33,826, compared to 183 in Waterloo.
- The median age in Waterloo is higher at 59.0 years, compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929 compared to $38,750 in Waterloo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cleburne at 39.0% compared to 29.0% in Waterloo.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterloo at 13%, compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- The unemployment rate in Cleburne is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Waterloo.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Waterloo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Waterloo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 52 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleburne at 6% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterloo at 97% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 2% in Waterloo.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 1% in Waterloo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Waterloo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Waterloo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Waterloo
- In Waterloo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterloo at 27.6% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Waterloo has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Waterloo.
- Waterloo has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterloo at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Waterloo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 0.5% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 10.4% (19) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 23.0% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 4.9% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Waterloo
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Waterloo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 10.4% in Waterloo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterloo at 23.0%, compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 4.9% in Waterloo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.