Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Sioux falls, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Sioux falls, SD.
| Data | Cleburne | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 202,078 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $71,785 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Sioux falls
- The population in Sioux falls is higher at 202,078, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- Residents in Cleburne have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
- Sioux falls has a higher median income of $71,785, compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cleburne at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Sioux falls.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cleburne and Sioux falls at 11%.
- The unemployment rate in Cleburne is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Sioux falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 7 |
| White | 52 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Sioux falls
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sioux falls at 78% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Sioux falls, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Cleburne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 5% in Sioux falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 6% in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Cleburne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 19.4% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Sioux falls
- More residents in Cleburne report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cleburne at 23.6% compared to 19.4% in Sioux falls.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleburne at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Sioux falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleburne at 37.6% compared to 35.8% in Sioux falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Sioux falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 0.8% (1,619) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 13.1% (26,548) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 7.3% (14,743) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 23.3% (47,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Sioux falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Sioux falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 13.1% in Sioux falls.
- More residents in Cleburne have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 7.3% in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.