Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Rochester, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Rochester, NY.
| Data | Cleburne | Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 209,352 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $44,156 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Rochester
- The population in Rochester is higher at 209,352, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- Residents in Cleburne have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 32.9 years in Rochester.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929 compared to $44,156 in Rochester.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cleburne at 39.0% compared to 20.0% in Rochester.
- The poverty level is higher in Rochester at 22%, compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- Rochester has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Rochester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 38 |
| White | 52 | 30 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Rochester
- In Rochester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of White residents at 52% compared to 30% in Rochester.
- In Rochester, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Cleburne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 20% in Rochester.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 8% in Rochester.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Rochester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 28.0% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Rochester
- In Rochester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rochester at 28.0% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Rochester has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 13.7% in Rochester.
- Rochester has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rochester at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Rochester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 1.8% (3,839) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 13.2% (27,564) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 16.7% (34,961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 19.4% (40,707) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Rochester
- In Rochester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Rochester.
- More residents in Cleburne have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Rochester.
- In Rochester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.