Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Lafayette, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Lafayette, IN.
| Data | Cleburne | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 71,402 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 33.0 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $50,674 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Lafayette
- The population in Lafayette is higher at 71,402, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- Residents in Cleburne have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 33.0 years in Lafayette.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929 compared to $50,674 in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cleburne at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Lafayette.
- The poverty level is higher in Lafayette at 14%, compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- Lafayette has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Lafayette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 9 |
| White | 52 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Lafayette
- In Lafayette, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lafayette at 72% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Lafayette, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Cleburne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 12% in Lafayette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 5% in Lafayette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Lafayette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Lafayette
- More residents in Cleburne report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.4% in Lafayette.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lafayette at 25.4% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleburne at 20.0% compared to 18.9% in Lafayette.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Lafayette.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleburne at 37.6% compared to 34.2% in Lafayette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lafayette at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Lafayette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 1.0% (735) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 18.6% (13,253) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 12.4% (8,844) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 17.9% (12,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Lafayette
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- More residents in Cleburne have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 12.4% in Lafayette.
- In Lafayette, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.