Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Fleischmanns, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Fleischmanns, NY.
Data | Cleburne | Fleischmanns |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,826 | 230 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 49.5 years |
Median Income | $60,929 | $60,417 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Fleischmanns
- In Cleburne, the population is higher at 33,826, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- The median age in Fleischmanns is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929 compared to $60,417 in Fleischmanns.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Fleischmanns.
- The unemployment rate in Cleburne is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.4% in Fleischmanns.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Fleischmanns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cleburne | Fleischmanns |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 52 | 54 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 35 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Fleischmanns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleburne at 6% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fleischmanns at 54% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Fleischmanns.
- Fleischmanns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 35%, compared to 29% in Cleburne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 7% in Fleischmanns.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 1% in Cleburne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cleburne | Fleischmanns |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.2% |
Depression | 23.6% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 37.6% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Fleischmanns
- More residents in Cleburne report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.6% in Fleischmanns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fleischmanns at 23.7% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleburne at 20.0% compared to 19.5% in Fleischmanns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleburne at 37.6% compared to 35.0% in Fleischmanns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cleburne | Fleischmanns |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 4.3% (10) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 20.0% (46) |
Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 21.7% (50) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 37.0% (85) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Fleischmanns
- In Fleischmanns, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 1.4% in Cleburne.
- In Fleischmanns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fleischmanns at 21.7%, compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- In Fleischmanns, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.