Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Cleburne | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar lake
- In Cleburne, the population is higher at 33,826, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Cleburne is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 52 | 94 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleburne at 6% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- The Asian population is larger in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar lake
- More residents in Cleburne report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleburne at 20.0% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleburne at 37.6% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- More residents in Cleburne have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.