Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Cedar grove, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Cedar grove, WV.

Data Cleburne Cedar grove
Population 33,826 693
Median Age 35.2 years 44.3 years
Median Income $60,929 $55,600
Married Families 39.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 4.5

Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar grove

  • In Cleburne, the population is higher at 33,826, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
  • Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929 compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cleburne at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cedar grove at 12%, compared to 11% in Cleburne.
  • Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.

Demographics

Demographics Cleburne vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cleburne Cedar grove
Black 6 Data is updating
White 52 98
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 29 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleburne at 6% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cleburne at 11% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cleburne at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cleburne Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 22.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 15.7%
Depression 23.6% 30.1%
Smoking 20.0% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 13.9%
Obesity 37.6% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
  • Cedar grove has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cleburne Cedar grove
No Schooling 1.4% (471) 0.6% (4)
High School Diploma 17.8% (6,005) 21.2% (147)
Less than High School 17.8% (6,010) 18.5% (128)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.0% (3,384) 2.3% (16)

Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Cedar grove.
  • In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar grove at 18.5%, compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.