Demographics details for Cleburne, TX vs Broken arrow, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cleburne, TX vs Broken arrow, OK.
| Data | Cleburne | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,826 | 117,911 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,929 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Cleburne vs Broken arrow
- The population in Broken arrow is higher at 117,911, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- The median age in Broken arrow is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- The unemployment rate in Cleburne is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Cleburne vs Broken arrow provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cleburne | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 5 |
| White | 52 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 29 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Cleburne vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cleburne at 6% compared to 5% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Broken arrow at 65% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Broken arrow, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Cleburne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cleburne at 29% compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- Both Cleburne and Broken arrow have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Broken arrow, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 1% in Cleburne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cleburne | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cleburne vs Broken arrow
- More residents in Cleburne report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broken arrow at 25.0% versus 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cleburne at 20.0% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cleburne at 37.6% compared to 34.6% in Broken arrow.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Cleburne and Broken arrow at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cleburne | Broken arrow |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (471) | 0.8% (935) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (6,005) | 13.2% (15,535) |
| Less than High School | 17.8% (6,010) | 6.6% (7,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (3,384) | 22.2% (26,196) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cleburne vs Broken arrow
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cleburne hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- More residents in Cleburne have less than a high school education at 17.8% compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- In Broken arrow, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.