Demographics details for Clearwater, FL vs Bigfork, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearwater, FL vs Bigfork, MN.
| Data | Clearwater | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 117,027 | 403 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 66.3 years |
| Median Income | $59,358 | $33,750 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clearwater vs Bigfork
- In Clearwater, the population is higher at 117,027, compared to 403 in Bigfork.
- The median age in Bigfork is higher at 66.3 years, compared to 46.0 years in Clearwater.
- Clearwater has a higher median income of $59,358 compared to $33,750 in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clearwater at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Bigfork.
- Clearwater has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Bigfork.
- Bigfork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Clearwater.
Demographics
Demographics Clearwater vs Bigfork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearwater | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 93 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Clearwater vs Bigfork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearwater at 11% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bigfork at 93% compared to 61% in Clearwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearwater at 3% compared to 0% in Bigfork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearwater at 17% compared to 2% in Bigfork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearwater at 8% compared to 1% in Bigfork.
- In Bigfork, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Clearwater.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearwater | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearwater vs Bigfork
- More residents in Clearwater report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Bigfork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bigfork at 24.3% versus 19.3% in Clearwater.
- Bigfork has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 20.8% in Clearwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bigfork at 18.4% compared to 17.2% in Clearwater.
- Bigfork has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 28.9% in Clearwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bigfork at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Clearwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearwater | Bigfork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (1,013) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (22,051) | 26.6% (107) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (14,532) | 9.7% (39) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.0% (28,122) | 8.2% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearwater vs Bigfork
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearwater have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Bigfork.
- In Bigfork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 18.8% in Clearwater.
- More residents in Clearwater have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 9.7% in Bigfork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 8.2% in Bigfork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.