Demographics details for Clearlake, CA vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearlake, CA vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Clearlake | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,693 | 242 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $41,047 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clearlake vs Summerfield
- In Clearlake, the population is higher at 16,693, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 38.6 years in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has a higher median income of $41,047 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Clearlake is higher at 7.2%, compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Clearlake vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearlake | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 48 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearlake vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearlake at 4% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearlake at 1% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearlake at 30% compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearlake at 13% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearlake at 4% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearlake | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.9% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearlake vs Summerfield
- More residents in Clearlake report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clearlake at 24.7% compared to 24.2% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clearlake at 22.8% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in Clearlake.
- Summerfield has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 37.7% in Clearlake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearlake | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (103) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (3,190) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 25.8% (4,311) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.3% (883) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearlake vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Clearlake.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 19.1% in Clearlake.
- More residents in Clearlake have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 17.4% in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.3% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.