Demographics details for Clearlake, CA vs Little suamico, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clearlake, CA vs Little suamico, WI.

Data Clearlake Little suamico
Population 16,693 4,878
Median Age 38.6 years 41.0 years
Median Income $41,047 $74,800
Married Families 25.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 21% 5%
Unemployment Rate 7.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Clearlake vs Little suamico

  • In Clearlake, the population is higher at 16,693, compared to 4,878 in Little suamico.
  • The median age in Little suamico is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 38.6 years in Clearlake.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $41,047 in Clearlake.
  • In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clearlake.
  • Clearlake has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • The unemployment rate in Clearlake is higher at 7.2%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Clearlake vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clearlake Little suamico
Black 4 1
White 48 95
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 30 2
Two or More Races 13 1
American Indian 4 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clearlake vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearlake at 4% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
  • Both Clearlake and Little suamico have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clearlake at 30% compared to 2% in Little suamico.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clearlake at 13% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearlake at 4% compared to 0% in Little suamico.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clearlake Little suamico
Mental Health Not Good 21.9% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 17.0% Data is updating%
Depression 24.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.7% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 23.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clearlake vs Little suamico

  • More residents in Clearlake report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clearlake at 24.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clearlake at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clearlake at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clearlake at 37.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clearlake Little suamico
No Schooling 0.6% (103) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.1% (3,190) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 25.8% (4,311) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.3% (883) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Clearlake vs Little suamico

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents in Clearlake have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 5.3% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.