Demographics details for Clearlake, CA vs Franklin, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearlake, CA vs Franklin, TX.
| Data | Clearlake | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,693 | 10,618 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $41,047 | $67,915 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Clearlake vs Franklin
- In Clearlake, the population is higher at 16,693, compared to 10,618 in Franklin.
- The median age in Franklin is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 38.6 years in Clearlake.
- Franklin has a higher median income of $67,915, compared to $41,047 in Clearlake.
- In Franklin, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 25.0% in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Franklin.
- The unemployment rate in Clearlake is higher at 7.2%, compared to 4.6% in Franklin.
Demographics
Demographics Clearlake vs Franklin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearlake | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 48 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 12 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearlake vs Franklin
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clearlake and Franklin at 4%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Franklin at 69% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearlake at 1% compared to 0% in Franklin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearlake at 30% compared to 15% in Franklin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearlake at 13% compared to 12% in Franklin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearlake at 4% compared to 0% in Franklin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearlake | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.9% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.0% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearlake vs Franklin
- More residents in Clearlake report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 16.3% in Franklin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clearlake at 24.7% compared to 23.5% in Franklin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clearlake at 22.8% compared to 14.8% in Franklin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin at 19.8% compared to 15.2% in Clearlake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clearlake at 37.7% compared to 33.2% in Franklin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Franklin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearlake | Franklin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (103) | 0.5% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 19.1% (3,190) | 15.0% (1,588) |
| Less than High School | 25.8% (4,311) | 11.3% (1,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.3% (883) | 21.2% (2,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearlake vs Franklin
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Franklin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearlake hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Franklin.
- More residents in Clearlake have less than a high school education at 25.8% compared to 11.3% in Franklin.
- In Franklin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 5.3% in Clearlake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.