Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Yacolt, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Yacolt, WA.

Data Clearfield Yacolt
Population 34,062 1,632
Median Age 29.8 years 29.2 years
Median Income $69,889 $79,479
Married Families 37.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 5.2

Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Yacolt

  • In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 1,632 in Yacolt.
  • Residents in Clearfield have a higher median age of 29.8 years compared to 29.2 years in Yacolt.
  • Yacolt has a higher median income of $79,479, compared to $69,889 in Clearfield.
  • In Yacolt, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Yacolt.
  • Yacolt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.3% in Clearfield.

Demographics

Demographics Clearfield vs Yacolt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clearfield Yacolt
Black 3 1
White 69 97
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 1
Two or More Races 8 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Yacolt

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearfield at 3% compared to 1% in Yacolt.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Yacolt at 97% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Yacolt.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 1% in Yacolt.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clearfield at 8% compared to 1% in Yacolt.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Yacolt.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clearfield Yacolt
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 11.5%
Depression 24.6% 26.9%
Smoking 10.2% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 19.2%
Obesity 36.3% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Yacolt

  • In Yacolt, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Yacolt at 26.9% versus 24.6% in Clearfield.
  • Yacolt has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Yacolt at 19.2% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clearfield at 36.3% compared to 33.0% in Yacolt.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clearfield at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Yacolt.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clearfield Yacolt
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 0.7% (12)
High School Diploma 13.8% (4,690) 21.4% (349)
Less than High School 10.7% (3,633) 13.1% (213)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (4,366) 4.9% (80)

Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Yacolt

  • In Yacolt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
  • In Yacolt, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.4% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yacolt at 13.1%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 4.9% in Yacolt.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.