Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Water valley, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Water valley, MS.

Data Clearfield Water valley
Population 34,062 3,361
Median Age 29.8 years 35.8 years
Median Income $69,889 $45,718
Married Families 37.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.3

Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Water valley

  • In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in Water valley is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clearfield at 37.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • Clearfield has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Clearfield and Water valley at 4.3%.

Demographics

Demographics Clearfield vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clearfield Water valley
Black 3 49
White 69 49
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 2
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
  • Clearfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clearfield at 8% compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clearfield Water valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 13.8%
Depression 24.6% 22.0%
Smoking 10.2% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 12.9%
Obesity 36.3% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clearfield at 24.6% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Water valley at 12.9% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
  • Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 36.3% in Clearfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clearfield Water valley
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 1.0% (34)
High School Diploma 13.8% (4,690) 24.0% (805)
Less than High School 10.7% (3,633) 13.0% (437)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (4,366) 9.6% (322)

Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Water valley

  • In Water valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
  • In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Water valley at 13.0%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.