Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Sherwood, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Sherwood, MI.
| Data | Clearfield | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,062 | 286 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,889 | $53,092 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Sherwood
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
- The median age in Sherwood is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Clearfield.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearfield | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearfield at 3% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 92% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearfield at 8% compared to 6% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clearfield and Sherwood at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearfield | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sherwood at 25.7% versus 24.6% in Clearfield.
- Sherwood has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sherwood at 18.4% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Sherwood has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.3% in Clearfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearfield | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 2.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 39.2% (112) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 45.1% (129) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 2.4% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
- In Sherwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sherwood at 45.1%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.