Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Ponca city, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Ponca city, OK.
Data | Clearfield | Ponca city |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,062 | 24,340 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $69,889 | $51,367 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Ponca city
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 24,340 in Ponca city.
- The median age in Ponca city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $51,367 in Ponca city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clearfield at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Ponca city.
- The poverty level is higher in Ponca city at 18%, compared to 10% in Clearfield.
- Ponca city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.3% in Clearfield.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Ponca city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clearfield | Ponca city |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 3 |
White | 69 | 67 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 17 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 8 |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Ponca city
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clearfield and Ponca city at 3%.
- Clearfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 67% in Ponca city.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 1% in Ponca city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 9% in Ponca city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ponca city at 12%, compared to 8% in Clearfield.
- In Ponca city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 1% in Clearfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clearfield | Ponca city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.6% |
Depression | 24.6% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 22.1% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Ponca city
- In Ponca city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ponca city at 27.0% versus 24.6% in Clearfield.
- Ponca city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ponca city at 14.8% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Ponca city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 36.3% in Clearfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ponca city at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clearfield | Ponca city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 0.2% (51) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 17.0% (4,148) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 12.0% (2,914) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 12.6% (3,069) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Ponca city
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Ponca city.
- In Ponca city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ponca city at 12.0%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 12.6% in Ponca city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.