Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Parker, SD.
| Data | Clearfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,062 | 1,221 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,889 | $83,864 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Parker
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $69,889 in Clearfield.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Clearfield is higher at 4.3%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 69 | 85 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 5% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearfield at 8% compared to 4% in Parker.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Clearfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Parker
- More residents in Clearfield report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clearfield at 24.6% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clearfield at 36.3% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clearfield at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 17.9% (218) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 13.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 13.0%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.