Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Junction, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Junction, TX.
Data | Clearfield | Junction |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,062 | 2,519 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $69,889 | $55,110 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Junction
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 2,519 in Junction.
- The median age in Junction is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $55,110 in Junction.
- In Junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction at 12%, compared to 10% in Clearfield.
- The unemployment rate in Clearfield is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Junction.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clearfield | Junction |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 3 |
White | 69 | 36 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 41 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Junction
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clearfield and Junction at 3%.
- Clearfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 36% in Junction.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 0% in Junction.
- Junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 41%, compared to 17% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction at 20%, compared to 8% in Clearfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Junction.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clearfield | Junction |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.9% |
Depression | 24.6% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 21.8% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Junction
- In Junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Junction at 25.7% versus 24.6% in Clearfield.
- Junction has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction at 16.9% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Junction has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 36.3% in Clearfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clearfield | Junction |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 2.1% (53) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 14.6% (369) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 24.4% (615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 13.0% (327) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Junction
- In Junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
- In Junction, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction at 24.4%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- In Junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.