Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Covington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Covington, KY.
Data | Clearfield | Covington |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,062 | 40,956 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 37.8 years |
Median Income | $69,889 | $53,770 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Covington
- The population in Covington is higher at 40,956, compared to 34,062 in Clearfield.
- The median age in Covington is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher median income of $69,889 compared to $53,770 in Covington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clearfield at 37.0% compared to 29.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Covington at 14%, compared to 10% in Clearfield.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.3% in Clearfield.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clearfield | Covington |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 10 |
White | 69 | 76 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 17 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Covington
- In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 3% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Covington at 76% compared to 69% in Clearfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Clearfield at 2% compared to 1% in Covington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clearfield at 17% compared to 8% in Covington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clearfield at 8% compared to 5% in Covington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Covington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clearfield | Covington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.3% |
Depression | 24.6% | 27.1% |
Smoking | 10.2% | 22.9% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Covington
- In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Clearfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Covington at 27.1% versus 24.6% in Clearfield.
- Covington has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Covington at 15.2% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Covington has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 36.3% in Clearfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Covington at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Clearfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clearfield | Covington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 1.0% (395) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 16.2% (6,618) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 18.6% (7,598) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 22.0% (8,998) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Covington
- In Covington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
- In Covington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 13.8% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 18.6%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- In Covington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.