Demographics details for Clearfield, UT vs Bonita, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clearfield, UT vs Bonita, CA.
| Data | Clearfield | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,062 | 13,473 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $69,889 | $115,118 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clearfield vs Bonita
- In Clearfield, the population is higher at 34,062, compared to 13,473 in Bonita.
- The median age in Bonita is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 29.8 years in Clearfield.
- Bonita has a higher median income of $115,118, compared to $69,889 in Clearfield.
- In Bonita, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Clearfield.
- Clearfield has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Bonita.
- The unemployment rate in Clearfield is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Bonita.
Demographics
Demographics Clearfield vs Bonita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clearfield | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 17 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 21 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clearfield vs Bonita
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clearfield at 3% compared to 2% in Bonita.
- Clearfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 17% in Bonita.
- In Bonita, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Clearfield.
- Bonita has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 17% in Clearfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bonita at 21%, compared to 8% in Clearfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clearfield at 1% compared to 0% in Bonita.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clearfield | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 10.2% | 9.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 23.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clearfield vs Bonita
- More residents in Clearfield report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.3% in Bonita.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clearfield at 24.6% compared to 16.2% in Bonita.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clearfield at 10.2% compared to 9.1% in Bonita.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bonita at 19.1% compared to 10.2% in Clearfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clearfield at 36.3% compared to 23.3% in Bonita.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clearfield at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Bonita.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clearfield | Bonita |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 1.3% (177) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (4,690) | 12.6% (1,704) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (3,633) | 13.3% (1,796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (4,366) | 29.2% (3,934) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clearfield vs Bonita
- In Bonita, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Clearfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clearfield hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 12.6% in Bonita.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bonita at 13.3%, compared to 10.7% in Clearfield.
- In Bonita, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.2% compared to 12.8% in Clearfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.