Demographics details for Clayton, OK vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OK vs Westminster, CO.
| Data | Clayton | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 555 | 114,533 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $27,083 | $90,651 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 114,533, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is higher in Westminster at 9%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 51 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 11 |
| American Indian | 20 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 2% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Westminster at 58% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 23% compared to 11% in Westminster.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clayton at 20% compared to 1% in Westminster.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 26.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Westminster
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 28.8% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 26.6% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 40.2% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (1,007) |
| High School Diploma | 37.5% (208) | 11.9% (13,626) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (108) | 10.3% (11,853) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (37) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 37.5% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.