Demographics details for Clayton, OK vs Warren, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OK vs Warren, VT.
| Data | Clayton | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 555 | 1,705 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $27,083 | $61,000 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 1.8 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Warren
- The population in Warren is higher at 1,705, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- The median age in Warren is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Warren has a higher median income of $61,000, compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- In Warren, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is higher in Warren at 5%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 1.8% in Warren.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Warren provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 51 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 23 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 20 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Warren
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Warren.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warren at 100% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Warren have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 4% compared to 0% in Warren.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 23% compared to 0% in Warren.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clayton at 20% compared to 0% in Warren.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 37.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Warren
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Warren |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 37.5% (208) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (108) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (37) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Warren
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Warren at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 37.5% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Warren.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.