Demographics details for Clayton, OK vs Tuscumbia, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OK vs Tuscumbia, MO.
| Data | Clayton | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 555 | 190 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $27,083 | $44,375 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Tuscumbia
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 555, compared to 190 in Tuscumbia.
- The median age in Tuscumbia is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Tuscumbia has a higher median income of $44,375, compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 31.0% compared to 21.0% in Tuscumbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Tuscumbia at 10%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clayton and Tuscumbia at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Tuscumbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 17 |
| White | 51 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 20 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Tuscumbia
- In Tuscumbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tuscumbia at 78% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- In Tuscumbia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 4% compared to 3% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 23% compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clayton at 20% compared to 0% in Tuscumbia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Tuscumbia
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 17.2% in Tuscumbia.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 28.8% compared to 22.2% in Tuscumbia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 26.6% compared to 22.5% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tuscumbia at 19.5% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 40.2% compared to 40.0% in Tuscumbia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscumbia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Tuscumbia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 37.5% (208) | 17.4% (33) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (108) | 18.9% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (37) | 4.7% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Tuscumbia
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Tuscumbia at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 37.5% compared to 17.4% in Tuscumbia.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 18.9% in Tuscumbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 4.7% in Tuscumbia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.