Demographics details for Clayton, OK vs Ontario, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OK vs Ontario, CA.
| Data | Clayton | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 555 | 184,705 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $27,083 | $67,659 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 30.5% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Ontario
- The population in Ontario is higher at 184,705, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- The median age in Ontario is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Ontario has a higher median income of $67,659, compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 31.0% compared to 30.5% in Ontario.
- The poverty level is higher in Ontario at 14%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Ontario has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Ontario provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8.5 |
| White | 51 | 36.2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6.0 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 44.5 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 4.8 |
| American Indian | 20 | 0.5 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Ontario
- In Ontario, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8.5% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 36.2% in Ontario.
- In Ontario, the Asian population stands at 6.0%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Ontario has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44.5%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 23% compared to 4.8% in Ontario.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clayton at 20% compared to 0.5% in Ontario.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 28.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 37.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Ontario
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 26.6% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 40.2% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Ontario |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 37.5% (208) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (108) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (37) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Ontario
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Ontario at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 37.5% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Ontario.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.